From: cluster.user@yale.edu (Cluster User)
Subject: Re: Caucasoid Turks/Bulgars
Date: 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <36f85e48.1078664627@news.yale.edu>
References: <369E3BE1.5C45@sbu.ac.uk> <77li2j$qi0$1@whisper.globalserve.net> <369F52FE.2B6@sbu.ac.uk> <77rc86$auj$1@brokaw.wa.com> <36A444B3.F3B70F1C@alum.mit.edu.-> <7827sb$269$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36A52D70.9E372DD2@alum.mit.edu.-> <36A556AB.9927BD29@montclair.edu> <36a63533.58309714@news.yale.edu> <7866ud$i9m$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36cdb21e.883120019@news.wxs.nl> <36A7FCC8.79790A6B@earthlink.net> <36d77e23.1000882888@news.wxs.nl> <36a8d455.81661202@news.yale.edu> <78pl3c$84o@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36b0dc2f.3434839@news.yale.edu> <78v30o$vl6@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36b34d7c.60430113@news.yale.edu> <794e84$4iq@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <3744d12a.1873763068@news.wxs.nl> <796m95$eq2@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <375c0ea6.1954957123@news.wxs.nl> <79fo99$qkl@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36effb24.440413110@news.yale.edu> <7cpddg$39q@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36f15786.251902035@news.yale.edu>
Organization: Yale University
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology,sci.lang

On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:45:35 GMT, cluster.user@yale.edu (Cluster User)
wrote:


>
>>Next, Dobrev analyses some composite names of elamite kings (the transcription
>>probably will differ from the english one):
>>
>> - TANRU-huratir         - 1960 BC    (1)
>> - SAMUTVAR-tash         - 1790 BC    (2)
>> - ATTARKIT-tah          - 1310 BC    (3)
>>   ...
>> - Nallutish-INSHUSHINAK - 1205 BC    (4)
>> - Shutruk-NAHUNTA       - 1185 BC    (5)
>> - Kutir-NAHUNTA         - 1155 BC    (6)
>>
>>
>>King (3) reigned 480 years after (2), and both had the common addition to their 
>>names - "tash", "tah". 480 is exactly 40 cycles of 12 years.
>>
>>King (5) has the name of "shutruk" which resembles "shupuruk" - a word for the bat 
>>used in northern india and the pamirs, and "kutir" in (6) resembles the dravidian
>>"kuthirai" (horse). And 1185 BC was exactly the year of the mouse, and 1155 - the
>>year of the horse in any modern cyclic calendar (chinese, turkic, tibetan).
>>
>>King (4) also has "nallutish" in his name, and "hannam, nallam" is a dravidian word
>>for dragon, and 1205 BC was the year of the dragon.
>>
>>The same pattern in some assyrian royal names - Tukulti-Ninurta (ascension in 1250 

I am informed by peter daniels that "tukulti" simply means "beloved of
..."


>>BC), and Tukulti-Ninurta II (890 BC). Both ascended to the throne in the year of
>>the horse, and in some eastern-caucasian l-s the horse is "tukku, teku" (from 
>>which probably comes the bulgar word). Another assyrian king - Sinnuishkun, came 
>>to the throne in 620 BC - the year of the bull. This king had two names - 
>>Sinnuishkun and Sarak. But "shinna" in chechen is 'ox', "sar" in buduh (east. cauc.)
>>is also 'ox'. So the king's name was Shinnu-Ishkun.
>
>but assyrian distinguishes between s- and *sh*-
>
>>
>>The names of Nabuchodonosor (Nevu-Hadresar) and Semiramide (Samar-Amat) also show 
>>the same traces. "Nevu" resembles the old-iranian, pamirian words "nehu, nek" 
>
>the -v- was a later development (based on masoretic hebrew)
>his name was nabu^ kudurri uSur "nabu^ (a god) protect the 
>boundary) nabu^ is from the semitic root "to call"
>
>of the pamiri word (< sans.) na:g is the older from.
>
>>(dragon), and "samar" - the afghan "zmaraj" (lion). And Nevu-hadresar ascended 
>>the throne in 604 BC, the year of the dragon, and Semiramide - in 810 BC, the
>>year of the tiger/lion.
>
>
>why should assyrians use bits and pieces of caucasian and
>pamirian words and leave no record of this calender system
>while their actual calender is known??!!
>
>>
>>Dobrev goes further to compare the elamite examples with the case of Mohendjo-Daro -
>>twelve constellations with names of gods-animals: god hare, god goat, crocodile,
>>lion, horse, scorpion, etc. The conclusion is that cyclic calendars (solar, not
>>only lunar as chinese) are quite old, with origins in the middle-east, and that 
>