From: cluster.user@yale.edu (Cluster User)
Subject: Re: Caucasoid Turks/Bulgars
Date: 10 Feb 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <36c1ff0a.227697661@news.yale.edu>
References: <369E3BE1.5C45@sbu.ac.uk> <77li2j$qi0$1@whisper.globalserve.net> <369F52FE.2B6@sbu.ac.uk> <77rc86$auj$1@brokaw.wa.com> <36A444B3.F3B70F1C@alum.mit.edu.-> <7827sb$269$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36A52D70.9E372DD2@alum.mit.edu.-> <36A556AB.9927BD29@montclair.edu> <36a63533.58309714@news.yale.edu> <7866ud$i9m$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36cdb21e.883120019@news.wxs.nl> <36A7FCC8.79790A6B@earthlink.net> <36d77e23.1000882888@news.wxs.nl> <36a8d455.81661202@news.yale.edu> <78pl3c$84o@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36b0dc2f.3434839@news.yale.edu> <78v30o$vl6@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36b34d7c.60430113@news.yale.edu> <794e84$4iq@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <3744d12a.1873763068@news.wxs.nl> <796m95$eq2@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <375c0ea6.1954957123@news.wxs.nl> <79fo99$qkl@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36c0be5b.7038981@news.yale.edu> <79skrj$u81@cpca3.uea.ac.uk>
Organization: Yale University
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology,sci.lang

On 10 Feb 1999 18:57:55 GMT, e.karloukovski@uea.ac.uk (Vassil
Karloukovski) wrote:


>>
>>>That the bulgar calendar was lunar and turkic was proposed by V. Zlatarski, 
>>>but you are right about the solar-lunar calendar, I checked another reference. -
>>>Most of the researchers had equated the bulgar calendar to the turkic solar-
>>>lunar calendars. A proper reference here would be: O. Pritsak, Die bulgarische 
>>>Fürstenliste und die Sprache der Protobulgaren, Ural-Altaische Bibliothek, 
>>>I, Wiesbaden, 1955, 1-102.
>>
>>I'll check it. menges in 1951 says that boodberg will be tackling the
>>problem of the nominalia, do you know if he published and where?
>
>
>No, I don't know. There is one recent bulgarian study of the nominalia done
>by Mosko Moskov (M. Moskov, Imennik na bylgarskite hanove, Sofia, 1988) who
>worked along the turkic hypothesis. According to him the original text of 
>the nominalia must have been written in greek and the present (slavic) text 
>we have is a rather clumsy translation from greek. So he, first, reconstructed
>the 'original' greek text, and after that translated it back, as he claims,
>correctly!
>
>An year ago Dr. A. Hetzer also mentioned in soc.culture.russian a recent 
>study on the (Volga) Bulgar inscriptions done by some prof. Erdal from 

probably marcel erdal. I couldn't find the post, if you could direct
me to it that would be helpful.

>Frankfurt, again, within the framework of turkic studies. But I don't
>know whether the nominalia was included there.
>
>
>Regards,
>Vassil K.
>