From: cluster.user@yale.edu (Cluster User)
Subject: Re: The Bulgars are Bulgars (Re: Caucasoid Turks/Bulgars)
Date: 31 Mar 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3701a898.21560622@news.yale.edu>
References: <36ca073a.16343620@news.yale.edu> <36cca3ed.14676934@news.yale.edu> <36cca75c.15555467@news.yale.edu> <36cf2980.190197920@news.yale.edu> <36dee7fa.108219411@news.yale.edu> <36e40f21.4849643@news.yale.edu> <7c6hs4$va@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36f6aeef.439178515@news.yale.edu> <7dajnt$ssk$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Organization: Yale University
Newsgroups: sci.lang

On Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:53:37 GMT, e.karloukovski@uea.ac.uk wrote:

>In article <36f6aeef.439178515@news.yale.edu>, cluster.user@yale.edu says...
>
>...
>....            Thank you for the other words, it seems you are going to
>invalidate 30-40% of the words in the list... :-))  Although it doesn't mean
>there couldn't be earlier, iranian forms for these words in pre-ottoman
>bulgarian.

for some of the words, perhaps yes - whetehr or not bulghar was
iranian is a different matter. a few of them, like meyxa^ne (a place
for drinking) belong to a different culture.

if you mean that could they have represented earlier iranain forms, I
would say no to the overwhelming majority of the words i picked out.
soem of them are turkish of turkic origin. some are of arabic origin.
some show clearly new persian - west iranian and recent - features
(much the same way one would reject the oghuric origin of these
words).  most show pronounciations and meanings that show the distinct
route of ottoman turkish.

>
>
>Regards,
>Vassil K.
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own