From: "Peter T. Daniels" Subject: Re: Caucasoid Turks/Bulgars Date: 29 Jan 1999 00:00:00 GMT Message-ID: <36B10759.4635@worldnet.att.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <369E3BE1.5C45@sbu.ac.uk> <77li2j$qi0$1@whisper.globalserve.net> <369F52FE.2B6@sbu.ac.uk> <77rc86$auj$1@brokaw.wa.com> <36A444B3.F3B70F1C@alum.mit.edu.-> <7827sb$269$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36A52D70.9E372DD2@alum.mit.edu.-> <36A556AB.9927BD29@montclair.edu> <36a63533.58309714@news.yale.edu> <7866ud$i9m$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <36cdb21e.883120019@news.wxs.nl> <36A7FCC8.79790A6B@earthlink.net> <36d77e23.1000882888@news.wxs.nl> <36A95129.AF5336A1@earthlink.net> <78ppdl$84o@cpca3.uea.ac.uk> <36b0d7ec.2343569@news.yale.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services Mime-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.archaeology,sci.anthropology,sci.lang Cluster User wrote: > >We should not worry too much. At the end, even the Scythians were thought to > >be Turkic in the 19-th century, so - be patient and probably in the due time > >the scholars will start to study the old Bulgars' question more seriously and > >without the constant repetition of the Turkic mantra. > > what I object to is calling the prevailing view a "mantra". it is not > made up of whole cloth. That would be a mantle. -- Peter T. Daniels grammatim@worldnet.att.net